Watchman outcomes comparing post-implantation anticoagulation with warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants.

PURPOSE: As left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAO) implantation rates grow, continued evaluation on best patient practices is important. We report pooled Watchman outcomes at a multicenter Texas healthcare system with an emphasis on clinical outcomes and post-implantation anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin. METHODS: Data for 163 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing Watchman implantation was collected via retrospective chart review between June 2016 and June 2018. A Fisher's exact test was utilized to evaluate associations in bivariate comparisons of categorical data. Tests of non-inferiority, applied between DOACs and warfarin, utilized a ratio of 2. RESULTS: Outcomes were significant for similar rates of stroke, disabling stroke, major bleeds, and all-cause mortality when compared to published clinical trials. Most patients with cerebrovascular events were found to have >5 mm peri-device leaks (PDLs), were on warfarin at the time of the event (75%), and all occurred within the first 6 months post implant. A significant number of patients were discharged on DOACs (42%). DOACs were shown to be non-inferior to warfarin with respect to stroke (p = 0.0048), disabling stroke (p = 0.0383), gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.0287), mortality (p = 0.0165), and combined adverse outcomes (p = 0.0040). DOACs were associated with less combined adverse outcomes (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that additional imaging or aggressive management of PDLs in Watchman recipients within the initial 6-month follow-up may aid in reducing stroke rates. Additionally, anticoagulation with DOACs' post Watchman implantation was found non-inferior to warfarin, with some evidence of lower risk for adverse outcomes favoring DOACs.

A Review of Temporary Permanent Pacemakers and a Comparison with Conventional Temporary Pacemakers.

Temporary cardiac pacing is commonly used in patients with life-threatening bradycardia and serves as a bridge to implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM). For years, passive fixation leads have been used for this purpose, offering the advantage of that they can be placed at bedside. The downside, however, is that patients must remain on telemetry and bed rest until lead removal due to the risk of displacement and failure to capture. Even then, the latter cannot always be prevented. Temporary cardiac pacing with passive fixation leads has also been related to a higher incidence of infection and venous thrombosis, delayed recovery, and increased length of stay. Thus, over the last couple of decades, pacemaker leads with an active fixation mechanism have become increasingly used. This is known as a temporary PPM (TPPM) approach, which carries a very low risk of lead dislodgement and allows patients to ambulate, among other advantages. Here, we performed a review of the literature on the use of TPPMs and their advantages over temporary pacemakers with passive fixation leads and in order to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of active and passive fixation leads in temporary cardiac pacing. Most articles found were case reports and case series, with few prospective studies. We excluded documents such as editorials and image case reports that provided little to no useful information for the final analysis. The literature search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and other databases and articles written in English and Spanish were considered. Articles were screened up to January 2017. The search keywords used were "temporary permanent pacemaker," "external permanent pacemaker," "active fixation lead," "explantable pacemaker," "hybrid pacing," "temporary permanent generator," "prolonged temporary transvenous pacing," and "semipermanent pacemaker." A total of 24 studies with 770 patients were ultimately included in our review. The age group was primarily above the sixth decade of life, with the exception of one that included pediatric patients. Indications for pacing included device infection, sick sinus syndrome, atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, and bradyarrhythmias associated with systemic illness. The duration of TPPM usage varied from a few days up to 336 days. A total of 18 (2.3%) TPPM-related infections were reported, in which the duration of TPPM use was less than 30 days in at least 15 patients. Loss of capture was documented in only eight patients (1.0%). Complication rates varied from 0% to 30%, with the highest event rates being present in studies that used femoral venous access. In conclusion, although no high-quality studies were identified in our literature search, we found the data retrieved suggest the association of overall favorable outcomes with the use of TPPMs. Device placement and removal typically involve a simple procedure, although fluoroscopy, usually applied in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, is necessary for implantation, which could represent an additional risk in a patient who is already hemodynamically unstable. When possible, a screw-in-lead pacemaker should be used for temporary pacing.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy resulting from atrial pacing: An unusual case of intraventricular conduction delay.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation is complicated by a significant rate of failure to place a left ventricular lead via the coronary sinus. The present case describes one such failure ironically leading to resynchronization. The patient's QRS narrowing subsequent to postimplant atrial pacing alone suggests that bradycardia-dependent phase 4 block was the indirect but exclusive cause of the patient's intraventricular conduction delay. Thus, phase 4 block should be considered when atrial pacing at a faster rate resolves a wide QRS interval.

Retrograde venography and three-dimensional mapping of a great cardiac vein with separate drainage into the high right atrium in a patient with Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome.

A 13-year-old boy presenting with palpitations was diagnosed with Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome. We elected to bring him to the electrophysiology lab for evaluation of the accessory pathway and potential ablation. Structural assessment of the coronary sinus with electro-anatomical mapping and retrograde venography led to the discovery of a great cardiac vein having a separate insertion from the coronary sinus into the high right atrium. The accessory pathway was localized to the left lateral portion of the mitral annulus and treated successfully with radiofrequency ablation. Such venous anatomical variant has been seldom reported, and its association with an accessory pathway is described here for the first time. Its recognition can have important implications when performing procedures that require access into the coronary venous system.

Aortic valve perforation secondary to blunt force trauma.

Blunt chest trauma has seldom been reported as a cause of rupture of an aortic valve cusp. We report the case of a 63-year-old man who had a motor vehicle collision resulting in transection of the descending thoracic aorta, splenic pseudoaneurysm, and rupture of an aortic valve cusp causing severe aortic regurgitation. Despite replacement of the aortic valve, he died of multiorgan failure.

First description of a double-wall balloon breach during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BALLOON BREACH DURING CRYOABLATION: To date, this is the first published report of a double-wall breach while using the cryoballoon ablation catheter during the treatment of a patient with atrial fibrillation; however, there have been previous balloon breaches in both the second and third-generation cryoballoon ablation catheter usage. In this report, we describe the case of a double-wall balloon breach and the intraoperative care that was necessary to stabilize the patient. Additionally, we review other known cases of double-wall balloon breaches, and we examine the safety systems of the cryoballoon catheter that mitigate some of the potential patient complications.

Frequency of Troponin Testing in Inpatient Versus Outpatient Settings.

Troponin elevation is required to diagnose acute myocardial infarction (AMI), yet elevated values are often encountered in noncardiac disease states. We evaluated inpatient (IP) and outpatient (OP) encounters at 14 hospitals in calendar year 2014 and found that troponin assays were performed during 12% of all OP visits and 29% of all IP visits: 82,853 encounters in all. We employed an expert panel to estimate the likelihood of AMI based on primary International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th edition diagnoses. We compared IP and OP testing, finding that AMI would not be expected in most IP encounters. Sepsis was the most common diagnosis associated with IP troponin testing. We found an association between troponin testing in patients with sepsis and utilization of electrocardiography, echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization. Our data indicate that troponin testing has expanded beyond patient populations in whom AMI might be expected.